Thursday, September 27, 2012

Say 'NO'

Remember to say 'NO' !!

You know which people are worthy to say yes. right? only be positive to them. Otherwise you will feel more cheaper and cheaper day by day. Just hate the other part.


Friday, September 21, 2012

Scientists Uncover Mechanism by Which Plants Inherit Epigenetic Modifications


collected ...

ScienceDaily (Sep. 20, 2012) — During embryonic development in humans and other mammals, sperm and egg cells are essentially wiped clean of chemical modifications to DNA called epigenetic marks. They are then held in reserve to await fertilization.

In flowering plants the scenario is dramatically different. Germ cells don't even appear until the post-embryonic period -- sometimes not until many years later. When they do appear, only some epigenetic marks are wiped away; some remain, carried over from prior generations -- although until now little was known about how or to what extent.
"What we did know," says Professor and HHMI-GBMF Investigator Rob Martienssen, Ph.D., of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL), "was that epigenetic inheritance -- the inheritance by offspring of chemical "tags" present in parental DNA that modify the expression of genes -- is much more widespread in plants than in animals."
In new research published online September 20 in the journal Cell, Martienssen and colleagues show that genome reprogramming through these epigenetic mechanisms is guided by small RNAs and is passed on to the next generation.
Some DNA is tagged with epigenetic marks
It has long been known that in plants, as the male germline pollen grains develop, they give rise to two sperm cells, and a structure called the vegetative nucleus, also known as the "nurse cell" because it provides energy and nourishment to the sperm cells.
The DNA in germ cells can exist in two dramatically different states: in one, it is very densely packed and essentially inaccessible to the cellular machinery that enables individual genes to be "expressed." In the other, in which the packing is much looser, genes can be expressed. In the latter state, because the genetic material is accessible, it is can also be modified by various chemical groups (two common ones are methyl and acetyl) which tend to attach to the DNA at specific locations.
These chemical tags are called epigenetic marks. The attachment of, for instance, a methyl group to a particular stretch of DNA containing a gene tends to prevent that gene from being accessed by the gene-expression machinery, and thus prevents the gene from being expressed.
Inherited methylation patterns are guided by small RNAs
Probing further into the set of modifications on the DNA in plant pollen grains, Martienssen and colleagues decided to look at the particular set of chemical marks called methyl groups. When they separated out pollen grains in different stages of development they found distinct patterns of the attachment of methyl groups to DNA.
They also noticed the corresponding accumulation of small RNAs, including two classes of so-called short-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) -- tiny RNA molecules, 21 or 24 nucleotides in length -- involved in silencing gene expression. These small siRNAs act as guides to where methylation will occur, silencing gene expression.
Previous work by the Martienssen lab and their collaborators, including a team of pollen specialists from the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia in Lisbon, Portugal, has shown that these epigenetic mechanisms are important for keeping transposons in check. Also known as "jumping genes" for their ability to be expressed and then re-insert themselves at random into a different area of the genome, transposons are dangerous because they can cause damage to DNA and disrupt genetic function.
In the current study, Martienssen's team discovered that while in sperm, some areas of DNA containing transposons had "lost" methyl groups, and thus had the potential to be expressed, the same stretches of DNA were observed to be methylated in the seed embryo. This was associated with the accumulation of 21 nucleotide long siRNA in the mature pollen and 24 nucelotide long siRNA in the seed embryo. Martienssen speculates that the loss of methylation in the sperm and subsequent re-methylation during fertilization may reflect an ancient mechanism for transposon recognition and silencing.
A second important observation made by the team was of the loss of methylation in "nurse cells." Methylation at these same sites is retained in the associated sperm cells, and, too, is associated with accumulation of 24 nucleotide siRNA. This process results in areas of recurrent epigenetic marking that are pre-methylated in the germline sperm and carried on to the next generation.
"This is what, at least in part, enables plants to inherit acquired traits from prior generations -- something that we mammals can rarely do," Martienssen observes.
Being able to trace the inheritance of traits -- both wanted and unwanted -- in plants, and notably in agricultural crops, is important for farmers. Martienssen predicts that "defining inheritance through epigenetic modifications will influence the ways people think about cross-breeding to select for desired traits." Such traits as resistance to temperature variation in crops have important agricultural and economic implications.


Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

Journal Reference:
  1. Joseph P. Calarco, Filipe Borges, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Frédéric Van Ex, Pauline E. Jullien, Telma Lopes, Rui Gardner, Frédéric Berger, José A. Feijó, Jörg D. Becker, Robert A. Martienssen. Reprogramming of DNA Methylation in Pollen Guides Epigenetic Inheritance via Small RNACell, 2012; DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.001
__._,_.___

Friday, January 27, 2012


Getting Rid of Contaminating DNA and the DNase Used to Destroy it

Because virtually all RNA samples have trace amounts of contaminating DNA, most protocols specify DNase treatment for RT-PCR applications. DNase I treatment is clearly the best way to rid an RNA sample of contaminating DNA. However, some preparations of DNase may be contaminated with RNases, and the DNase must be completely inactivated prior to RT-PCR so that it doesn't degrade newly synthesized DNA. Unfortunately, removal or inactivation of this enzyme is problematic; DNase removal methods can be inconvenient, ineffective and even detrimental to RNA integrity.

Commonly used methods for removal or inactivation of DNase after digestion include: heat inactivation, proteinase K treatment followed by phenol:chloroform extraction, chelation of essential ions with EDTA, and purification using a glass-filter binding method such as RNAqueous® (see the sidebar at right, "RNA Isolation for RT-PCR). Each of these inactivation or removal methods has its drawbacks.

Heat inactivation: Probably the most common method of DNase inactivation is heat treatment, typically for 5 minutes at 75°C. Although this method appears straightforward, the divalent cations in the DNase digestion buffer can cause (chemically-induced) strand scission of RNA when heated. Studies at Ambion have shown that much of an RNA sample is destroyed when heated to 80°C for 5 minutes in the presence of 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mM CaCl2 (salts typically found in DNase I digestion buffer).

Proteinase K treatment and organic extraction: Proteinase K treatment followed by phenol:chloroform extraction is probably the most rigorous method for DNase inactivation and removal, but it is time-consuming, and organic extractions often cause some sample loss. Sample loss can be minimized by back extraction of the phenol:chloroform phase, but this adds another step to an already time-consuming procedure. Additionally, many people prefer to avoid working with hazardous phenol.

EDTA chelation of cations: The addition of EDTA to DNase digestion reactions chelates ions in the digestion buffer, that are required for DNase I activity. The DNase I can then be safely heat inactivated without loss of RNA. However, Mg2+ is needed for enzymatic activity of both the reverse transcriptase and the thermostable DNA polymerase. Thus the chelation capacity of the EDTA must be saturated with additional ions prior to subsequent enzymatic reactions. This can make the assembly of a simple reaction quite complicated.

RNA purification: Some filter-based RNA isolation methods treat with DNase directly on the filter after binding of the lysate. This treatment may not completely eliminate contaminating DNA because the DNase will not be in an optimal environment for digestion (traces of lysis solution and other contaminants may interfere with optimal digestion). Alternatively, RNA preparations that have been treated with DNase in solution, can be purified away from DNase over such columns. Although this technique adequately removes DNase from the prep, it requires both an extra step, and expensive materials.